Shocking new information from Shannon Dingle, MAEd, from Raleigh, NC.  She is a special needs teacher in her church in Providence Baptist Church in Raleigh.

The journal article: After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? And this isn’t just any publication; it was found in the Journal of Medical Ethics. The juxtaposition of the idea of ethics with what’s put forth in this journal is ironic at best.

Here are some quotes from the article itself. First the abstract (emphasis mine):

Abortion is largely accepted even for reasons that do not have anything to do with the fetus’ health. By showing that (1) both fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons, (2) the fact that both are potential persons is morally irrelevant and (3) adoption is not always in the best interest of actual people, the authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled.  To read more…

Advertisements